- Replacing Linear MCP with linear-cli#
Linear is one of my favorite software finds of the last few years. I’m not as big of a fan when it comes to their token-hungry MCP server though. I recently switched to this (unofficial) CLI and my rough estimate is that it saves me between 5k to 25k tokens a session.
I asked Claude to sample the differences and it came back with medians based on 71 tickets. Note the unit here is characters:
Operation MCP CLI MCP ÷ CLI Update issue 3,061 211 14.5× Read (no comments) 3,721 2,311 1.6× Read (with comments) 4,531 2,615 1.7× The explanation for both differences is simple and comes down to sane defaults and flexibility, both of which the MCP lacks:
get_issuereturns thirty-one fields. Those include the issue’s body and status, but also fields likeslaStartedAt,slaMediumRiskAt,slaHighRiskAt,slaBreachesAt. The last few are alwaysnullin my workspace. The CLI doesn’t return them by default.For updates, the CLI returns a simple success message while the MCP’s
update_issueresponse is almost as big as the read payload. Neither MCP tools accepts a parameter that makes its response smaller.